English Practice Question and Answer
8 Q:In the following passage, some of the words have been left out. First, read the passage over and try to understand what is about. Then fill in the blanks with the help of the alternatives given. Mark your answer in the Answer-sheet.
The library, if used properly, is invaluable in helping you develop discernment. It is rich………..(1)……….information that goes far beyond the……….(2)……….of any one text book or course…..(3)…….your text book authors does not make a particular……….(4)…………clear and you feel the need……..(5)………another description in greater detail………..(6)………in other words, go to the library and ………7)….other books on the subject. By calling……(8)……..two or three writers dealing with the ……..(9)…….topic, you will find some…..(10)……of certain facts. In seeking additional sources, you will have gained immeasurably, for you will have seen what several experts perceive as being particularly important on common subject.
(Mark your answer 4)
1374 05d807a0a26eba62f09c1395b
5d807a0a26eba62f09c1395b(Mark your answer 4)
- 1informationfalse
- 2entryfalse
- 3explanationfalse
- 4pointtrue
- Show AnswerHide Answer
- Workspace
- SingleChoice
Answer : 4. "point"
- Show AnswerHide Answer
- Workspace
- SingleChoice
Answer : 3. "They are wary of cumber some police formalities and legal systems."
Q: Direction: Choose the correct alternative of the following sentences.
He said, “ I am unwell.”
1372 05d7a006c9b43216ae13d60d4
5d7a006c9b43216ae13d60d4He said, “ I am unwell.”
- 1He said that he is unwellfalse
- 2He said that he was unwelltrue
- 3He said that I will unwellfalse
- 4He said that I was unwellfalse
- Show AnswerHide Answer
- Workspace
- SingleChoice
Answer : 2. " He said that he was unwell"
Q:Direction: In the following question, out of the four alternatives, choose the one which can be substituted for the given sentence.
A government by officials.
1371 05d985fa71ece4b483a8c4fc9
5d985fa71ece4b483a8c4fc9- 1Oligarchyfalse
- 2Aristocracyfalse
- 3Plutocracyfalse
- 4Bureaucracytrue
- Show AnswerHide Answer
- Workspace
- SingleChoice
Answer : 4. "Bureaucracy "
Q:Directions: In question four alternatives are given for the Idiom/Phrase underlined in the sentences. Choose the alternative which best expresses the meaning of the Idiom/Phrase and mark it is the Answer Sheet.
Reading between the lines I realised that my friend wanted to keep something from me.
1371 05dd3c285874d2d52fa32254f
5dd3c285874d2d52fa32254f- 1Looking for meanings that are not actually expressedtrue
- 2Reading carelesslyfalse
- 3Reading with anxietyfalse
- 4Glancing over the linesfalse
- Show AnswerHide Answer
- Workspace
- SingleChoice
Answer : 1. "Looking for meanings that are not actually expressed "
Q:Directions : A word has been given in each question and has been used in the sentences given below. Identify the statements where the word has been used in a contextually and grammatically correct manner. If the word has been used correctly in all the statements, mark (e), “All of these”, as your answer.
VAGUE
(i) The judges determined that the law was too vague to be fairly enforced.
(ii) The merger of these two companies would vague the world's biggest accounting firm
(iii)The president had a vague reception in Ohio this morning.
1371 0617f97d89737a63d8affee90
617f97d89737a63d8affee90(ii) The merger of these two companies would vague the world's biggest accounting firm
(iii)The president had a vague reception in Ohio this morning.
- 1Only (i)true
- 2Both (i) and (ii)false
- 3Both (ii) and (iii)false
- 4Both (ii) and (iii)false
- 5All of thesefalse
- Show AnswerHide Answer
- Workspace
- SingleChoice
Answer : 1. "Only (i) "
Q:Direction: In the following questions, out of the four alternatives, choose the word opposite in meaning of the given word as your answer.
Vigilant
1371 05f0d3cb0fce67160728dc1fb
5f0d3cb0fce67160728dc1fb- 1Observantfalse
- 2Arousedfalse
- 3Numbtrue
- 4Activefalse
- Show AnswerHide Answer
- Workspace
- SingleChoice
Answer : 3. "Numb"
Q:Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below it. Certain words/phrases have been printed in bold to help you locate them while answering some of the questions.
A new analysis has determined that the threat of global warming can still be greatly diminished if nations cut emissions of heat-trapping greenhouse gases by 70% this century. The analysis was done by scientists at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR). While global temperatures would rise, the most dangerous potential aspects of climate change, including massive losses of Arctic sea ice and permafrost and significant sea-level rise, could be partially avoided.
“This research indicates that we can no longer avoid significant warming during this century,” said NCAR scientist Warren Washington, the study paper's lead author. “But, if the world were to implement this level of emission cuts, we could stabilize the threat of climate change", he added.
Average global temperatures have warmed by close to 1 degree Celsius since the pre-industrial era. Much of the warming is due to human-produced emissions of greenhouse gases, predominantly carbon dioxide. This heat-trapping gas has increased from a pre-industrial level of about 284 parts per million ( ppm ) in the atmosphere to more than 380 ppm today. With research showing that additional warming of about 1 degree C may be the threshold for dangerous – climate change, the European Union has called for dramatic cuts in emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases.
To examine the impact of such cuts on the world's climate, Washing ton and his colleagues ran a series of global studies with the NCAR - based Community Climate System Model (CCSM). They assumed that carbon dioxide levels could be held to 450 ppm at the end of this century. In contrast, emissions are now on track to reach about 750 ppm by 2100 if unchecked. The team's results showed that if carbon dioxide were held to 450 ppm, global temperatures would increase by 0.6 degrees Celsius above current readings by the end of the century. In contrast, the study showed that temperatures would rise by almost four times that amount to 2.2 degrees Celsius above current readings if emissions were allowed to continue on their present course. Holding carbon dioxide levels to 450 ppm would have other impacts, according to the climate modeling study.
Sea-level rise due to thermal expansion as water temperatures warmed would be 14 centimeters about (5.5 inches) instead of 22 centimeters (8.7 inches). Also, Arctic ice in the summertime would shrink by about a quarter in volume and stabilize by 2100, as opposed to shrinking at least three quarters and continuing to melt, and Arctic warming would be reduced by almost half.
What would be the impact of unchecked greenhouse gas and carbon dioxide emissions?
1370 05d9dc28082ff737fd6a858db
5d9dc28082ff737fd6a858dbA new analysis has determined that the threat of global warming can still be greatly diminished if nations cut emissions of heat-trapping greenhouse gases by 70% this century. The analysis was done by scientists at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR). While global temperatures would rise, the most dangerous potential aspects of climate change, including massive losses of Arctic sea ice and permafrost and significant sea-level rise, could be partially avoided.
“This research indicates that we can no longer avoid significant warming during this century,” said NCAR scientist Warren Washington, the study paper's lead author. “But, if the world were to implement this level of emission cuts, we could stabilize the threat of climate change", he added.
Average global temperatures have warmed by close to 1 degree Celsius since the pre-industrial era. Much of the warming is due to human-produced emissions of greenhouse gases, predominantly carbon dioxide. This heat-trapping gas has increased from a pre-industrial level of about 284 parts per million ( ppm ) in the atmosphere to more than 380 ppm today. With research showing that additional warming of about 1 degree C may be the threshold for dangerous – climate change, the European Union has called for dramatic cuts in emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases.
To examine the impact of such cuts on the world's climate, Washing ton and his colleagues ran a series of global studies with the NCAR - based Community Climate System Model (CCSM). They assumed that carbon dioxide levels could be held to 450 ppm at the end of this century. In contrast, emissions are now on track to reach about 750 ppm by 2100 if unchecked. The team's results showed that if carbon dioxide were held to 450 ppm, global temperatures would increase by 0.6 degrees Celsius above current readings by the end of the century. In contrast, the study showed that temperatures would rise by almost four times that amount to 2.2 degrees Celsius above current readings if emissions were allowed to continue on their present course. Holding carbon dioxide levels to 450 ppm would have other impacts, according to the climate modeling study.
Sea-level rise due to thermal expansion as water temperatures warmed would be 14 centimeters about (5.5 inches) instead of 22 centimeters (8.7 inches). Also, Arctic ice in the summertime would shrink by about a quarter in volume and stabilize by 2100, as opposed to shrinking at least three quarters and continuing to melt, and Arctic warming would be reduced by almost half.
- 1The temperature would rise from the current temperature by 2.2 degrees Celsiustrue
- 2The sea-level would rise by about 5.5 inchesfalse
- 3The arctic ice would stabilize by 2100false
- 4The arctic ice would reduce by one-fourthfalse
- 5None of thesefalse
- Show AnswerHide Answer
- Workspace
- SingleChoice
Answer : 1. "The temperature would rise from the current temperature by 2.2 degrees Celsius"
Explanation :
undefined

