Practice Question and Answer
8 Q: Recently, what position has India got in World Bank's 'Human Capital Index 2020' released?
1796 05f68348c32245344c4bba392
5f68348c32245344c4bba392- 1108thfalse
- 2112thfalse
- 3116thtrue
- 4124thfalse
- Show AnswerHide Answer
- Workspace
- SingleChoice
Answer : 3. "116th"
Q: Which athletics coach, the Dronacharya medalist, has died of a heart attack at the age of 79?
1796 05f4cbccf82369c1d610ded93
5f4cbccf82369c1d610ded93- 1Purushottam Raitrue
- 2Vasant Kumarfalse
- 3Rohit Royfalse
- 4Vedant Sharmafalse
- Show AnswerHide Answer
- Workspace
- SingleChoice
Answer : 1. "Purushottam Rai"
Q: Have you ever been in a situation where significant change was made to your team, department or organisation? How did you adjust? 1796 05b5cc7bde4d2b419777509ec
5b5cc7bde4d2b419777509ec- Show AnswerHide Answer
- Workspace
- SingleChoice
Answer :
Explanation :
The purpose of this question is to check your adaptability and flexibility. Did you feel victimized? Answer this question by mentioning the change that was made but the main focus should be on how you adjusted in that situation and the results you achieved afterwards. For example you can say something like, “Being an early joiner in the marketing team, I opened a lot of new customer accounts. Over the time the team grew and we had more people in the team opening more accounts. At one point of time, we had to re-distribute the accounts area wise so that a particular territory can be allotted to each one of us. This re-distribution meant loss of my high performing accounts and a requirement to develop new accounts in the assigned territory. Initially, it looked difficult but I could understand the need for this re-distribution and saw more opportunities for the company and myself. I introduced my colleagues to the old accounts I held and started strategizing for better ways to tap the new territory. Within 6 months, I could develop 50 new accounts with the help of new strategy. Usually we would achieve this result in 9 months to a year.”
Q: Identify a type of season that is NOT a part of the four seasons of India.
1796 164c39145a919c8488e12b0b4
64c39145a919c8488e12b0b4- 1The cold weather seasonfalse
- 2The hot weather seasonfalse
- 3The southwest monsoon seasonfalse
- 4The southeast monsoon seasontrue
- Show AnswerHide Answer
- Workspace
- SingleChoice
Answer : 4. "The southeast monsoon season"
Explanation :
There are mainly six seasons in India. Which is written below.
1. Autumn season lasts from October to November. In the Hindu calendar, it ranges from Aghaan month to Kartik month.
2. The weather becomes clear in spring. Sunlight is available throughout the day.
3. Summer season lasts from May to June.
4. Rainy season is a season favorable to nature. This season lasts from July to September.
5. The temperature drops after the rainy season in the autumn season.
6. Winter season lasts from January to February. In the Hindu calendar it ranges from Magh to Phagun.
Q: Ronald Reagan, the 40th President of the US, signed the largest tax cut in the history of the country in 1981. Which economic theory was this policy centred around?
1796 164bfca6f24c8d11f42a6e8f8
64bfca6f24c8d11f42a6e8f8- 1Laffer Curvetrue
- 2Lorenz Curvefalse
- 3Kuznets Curvefalse
- 4Sweezy's Kinked Demand Curvefalse
- Show AnswerHide Answer
- Workspace
- SingleChoice
Answer : 1. "Laffer Curve"
Explanation :
1. Ronald Reagan, the 40th US President, signed the largest tax cut in his country's history in 1981.
2. This policy focused on the economic theory of Laffer Curve.
3. Laffer curve explains the relationship between tax rate and tax revenue.
Q:Select the option that expresses the given sentence in indirect speech.
She said impatiently, “I don’t need any help.”
1796 064aaafeec4e3d04ca1741857
64aaafeec4e3d04ca1741857- 1She said impatiently that I don’t need any help.false
- 2She said impatiently that she didn’t need any help.true
- 3She said impatiently she don’t need any help.false
- 4She said impatiently that she doesn’t need any help.false
- Show AnswerHide Answer
- Workspace
- SingleChoice
Answer : 2. "She said impatiently that she didn’t need any help."
Q:Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below it. Certain words/phrases have been printed in bold to help you locate them while answering some of the questions.
A new analysis has determined that the threat of global warming can still be greatly diminished if nations cut emissions of heat-trapping greenhouse gases by 70% this century. The analysis was done by scientists at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR). While global temperatures would rise, the most dangerous potential aspects of climate change, including massive losses of Arctic sea ice and permafrost and significant sea-level rise, could be partially avoided.
“This research indicates that we can no longer avoid significant warming during this century,” said NCAR scientist Warren Washington, the study paper's lead author. “But, if the world were to implement this level of emission cuts, we could stabilize the threat of climate change", he added.
Average global temperatures have warmed by close to 1 degree Celsius since the pre-industrial era. Much of the warming is due to human-produced emissions of greenhouse gases, predominantly carbon dioxide. This heat-trapping gas has increased from a pre-industrial level of about 284 parts per million ( ppm ) in the atmosphere to more than 380 ppm today. With research showing that additional warming of about 1 degree C may be the threshold for dangerous – climate change, the European Union has called for dramatic cuts in emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases.
To examine the impact of such cuts on the world's climate, Washing ton and his colleagues ran a series of global studies with the NCAR - based Community Climate System Model (CCSM). They assumed that carbon dioxide levels could be held to 450 ppm at the end of this century. In contrast, emissions are now on track to reach about 750 ppm by 2100 if unchecked. The team's results showed that if carbon dioxide were held to 450 ppm, global temperatures would increase by 0.6 degrees Celsius above current readings by the end of the century. In contrast, the study showed that temperatures would rise by almost four times that amount to 2.2 degrees Celsius above current readings if emissions were allowed to continue on their present course. Holding carbon dioxide levels to 450 ppm would have other impacts, according to the climate modeling study.
Sea-level rise due to thermal expansion as water temperatures warmed would be 14 centimeters about (5.5 inches) instead of 22 centimeters (8.7 inches). Also, Arctic ice in the summertime would shrink by about a quarter in volume and stabilize by 2100, as opposed to shrinking at least three quarters and continuing to melt, and Arctic warming would be reduced by almost half.
What would be the impact of unchecked greenhouse gas and carbon dioxide emissions?
1796 05d9dc28082ff737fd6a858db
5d9dc28082ff737fd6a858dbA new analysis has determined that the threat of global warming can still be greatly diminished if nations cut emissions of heat-trapping greenhouse gases by 70% this century. The analysis was done by scientists at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR). While global temperatures would rise, the most dangerous potential aspects of climate change, including massive losses of Arctic sea ice and permafrost and significant sea-level rise, could be partially avoided.
“This research indicates that we can no longer avoid significant warming during this century,” said NCAR scientist Warren Washington, the study paper's lead author. “But, if the world were to implement this level of emission cuts, we could stabilize the threat of climate change", he added.
Average global temperatures have warmed by close to 1 degree Celsius since the pre-industrial era. Much of the warming is due to human-produced emissions of greenhouse gases, predominantly carbon dioxide. This heat-trapping gas has increased from a pre-industrial level of about 284 parts per million ( ppm ) in the atmosphere to more than 380 ppm today. With research showing that additional warming of about 1 degree C may be the threshold for dangerous – climate change, the European Union has called for dramatic cuts in emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases.
To examine the impact of such cuts on the world's climate, Washing ton and his colleagues ran a series of global studies with the NCAR - based Community Climate System Model (CCSM). They assumed that carbon dioxide levels could be held to 450 ppm at the end of this century. In contrast, emissions are now on track to reach about 750 ppm by 2100 if unchecked. The team's results showed that if carbon dioxide were held to 450 ppm, global temperatures would increase by 0.6 degrees Celsius above current readings by the end of the century. In contrast, the study showed that temperatures would rise by almost four times that amount to 2.2 degrees Celsius above current readings if emissions were allowed to continue on their present course. Holding carbon dioxide levels to 450 ppm would have other impacts, according to the climate modeling study.
Sea-level rise due to thermal expansion as water temperatures warmed would be 14 centimeters about (5.5 inches) instead of 22 centimeters (8.7 inches). Also, Arctic ice in the summertime would shrink by about a quarter in volume and stabilize by 2100, as opposed to shrinking at least three quarters and continuing to melt, and Arctic warming would be reduced by almost half.
- 1The temperature would rise from the current temperature by 2.2 degrees Celsiustrue
- 2The sea-level would rise by about 5.5 inchesfalse
- 3The arctic ice would stabilize by 2100false
- 4The arctic ice would reduce by one-fourthfalse
- 5None of thesefalse
- Show AnswerHide Answer
- Workspace
- SingleChoice
Answer : 1. "The temperature would rise from the current temperature by 2.2 degrees Celsius"
Explanation :
undefined
Q:Direction (6-10): Study the following information carefully to answer these questions.
Eight persons A, B , C , D, E , F , G and H work for three different companies namely X, Y and Z. Not more than three persons work for a company. There are only two ladies in the group who have different specialization in each HR, Finance and Marketing. One member is an engineer and one is a doctor. H is an HR Specialist and works with a marketing specialist B who does not work for company Y. C is an engineer and his sister work in company Z. D is a specialist in HR working in company X while her friend G is a finance specialist and works for company Z. No Two persons having the same specialization work together. Marketing specialist F works for company Y and his friend A who is a finance expert works for company X in which only two specialists work. No lady is a marketing specialist or a doctor.
For which of the following companies does C work?
1796 05d9f1b7222d4805a9cf56898
5d9f1b7222d4805a9cf56898- 1Ytrue
- 2Xfalse
- 3Zfalse
- 4Data inadequatefalse
- 5None of thesefalse
- Show AnswerHide Answer
- Workspace
- SingleChoice
Answer : 1. "Y"
Explanation :
undefined

