Practice Question and Answer
8 Q: In a row of cars, blue car is at the bottom end. There are 18 cars between yellow and blue car. There are 8 cars between red and blue car. If there are 6 cars above yellow car, then how many minimum cars are there in the row?
2520 05f51dd7bd1335638dccc68d5
5f51dd7bd1335638dccc68d5- 134false
- 235false
- 332false
- 426true
- Show AnswerHide Answer
- Workspace
- SingleChoice
Answer : 4. "26"
Q: If F = 6 and FOX = 45, then find the value of LION.
2520 0631ae9dc6a8658350003b0f1
631ae9dc6a8658350003b0f1- 149false
- 250true
- 353false
- 457false
- Show AnswerHide Answer
- Workspace
- SingleChoice
Answer : 2. "50"
Q: A shopkeeper sells one-third of his goods at a profit of 10%, another one-third at a profit of 20%, and the rest at a loss of 6%.What is his overall profit percentage ? 2519 05b5cc7a5e4d2b41977750674
5b5cc7a5e4d2b41977750674- 16%false
- 28%true
- 310%false
- 412%false
- Show AnswerHide Answer
- Workspace
- SingleChoice
Answer : 2. "8%"
Explanation :
Answer: B) 8% Explanation: Let the shopkeeper buy 300g for Rs.300. Now he sells 100g for Rs.110, another 100g for Rs120, and the rest 100g for Rs94. Therefore, the total amount he receives = Rs.110 + Rs.120 + Rs.94 = 324. Therefore, the shopkeeper spends Rs.300 and gets back Rs.324. Therefore, his profit percentage = 24300x100 % = 8%
Q: Well-Known oralcare brand, Oral-B is owned by which company? 2519 05b5cc7c3e4d2b41977750b51
5b5cc7c3e4d2b41977750b51- 1Procter & Gambletrue
- 2Colgatefalse
- 3Gilettefalse
- 4Reckitt Benckiserfalse
- Show AnswerHide Answer
- Workspace
- SingleChoice
Answer : 1. "Procter & Gamble"
Explanation :
Answer: A) Procter & Gamble Explanation:
Q: In the question below, two statements are given followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the two statements to be true even if they seem to be variance from the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding the commonly known facts.
Statements: Some rings are circles.
No circle is a square.
Conclusion I. No ring is a square.
II. All rings are squares.
2519 05d4c0a4d0c5c9f706c69a99b
5d4c0a4d0c5c9f706c69a99bStatements: Some rings are circles.
No circle is a square.
Conclusion I. No ring is a square.
II. All rings are squares.
- 1If only conclusion I followstrue
- 2if only conclusion II followsfalse
- 3if either conclusion I or conclusion II followsfalse
- 4If neither conclusion I nor conclusion II followsfalse
- 5If both conclusions I and II followfalse
- Show AnswerHide Answer
- Workspace
- SingleChoice
Answer : 1. "If only conclusion I follows"
Q:Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below it. Certain words/phrases have been printed in bold to help you locate them while answering some of the questions.
A new analysis has determined that the threat of global warming can still be greatly diminished if nations cut emissions of heat-trapping greenhouse gases by 70% this century. The analysis was done by scientists at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR). While global temperatures would rise, the most dangerous potential aspects of climate change, including massive losses of Arctic sea ice and permafrost and significant sea-level rise, could be partially avoided.
“This research indicates that we can no longer avoid significant warming during this century,” said NCAR scientist Warren Washington, the study paper's lead author. “But, if the world were to implement this level of emission cuts, we could stabilize the threat of climate change", he added.
Average global temperatures have warmed by close to 1 degree Celsius since the pre-industrial era. Much of the warming is due to human-produced emissions of greenhouse gases, predominantly carbon dioxide. This heat-trapping gas has increased from a pre-industrial level of about 284 parts per million ( ppm ) in the atmosphere to more than 380 ppm today. With research showing that additional warming of about 1 degree C may be the threshold for dangerous – climate change, the European Union has called for dramatic cuts in emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases.
To examine the impact of such cuts on the world's climate, Washing ton and his colleagues ran a series of global studies with the NCAR - based Community Climate System Model (CCSM). They assumed that carbon dioxide levels could be held to 450 ppm at the end of this century. In contrast, emissions are now on track to reach about 750 ppm by 2100 if unchecked. The team's results showed that if carbon dioxide were held to 450 ppm, global temperatures would increase by 0.6 degrees Celsius above current readings by the end of the century. In contrast, the study showed that temperatures would rise by almost four times that amount to 2.2 degrees Celsius above current readings if emissions were allowed to continue on their present course. Holding carbon dioxide levels to 450 ppm would have other impacts, according to the climate modeling study.
Sea-level rise due to thermal expansion as water temperatures warmed would be 14 centimeters about (5.5 inches) instead of 22 centimeters (8.7 inches). Also, Arctic ice in the summertime would shrink by about a quarter in volume and stabilize by 2100, as opposed to shrinking at least three quarters and continuing to melt, and Arctic warming would be reduced by almost half.
Why has the European Union called for dramatic cuts in carbon dioxide and greenhouse gas emissions?
2519 05d9dc1ece215617fef761455
5d9dc1ece215617fef761455A new analysis has determined that the threat of global warming can still be greatly diminished if nations cut emissions of heat-trapping greenhouse gases by 70% this century. The analysis was done by scientists at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR). While global temperatures would rise, the most dangerous potential aspects of climate change, including massive losses of Arctic sea ice and permafrost and significant sea-level rise, could be partially avoided.
“This research indicates that we can no longer avoid significant warming during this century,” said NCAR scientist Warren Washington, the study paper's lead author. “But, if the world were to implement this level of emission cuts, we could stabilize the threat of climate change", he added.
Average global temperatures have warmed by close to 1 degree Celsius since the pre-industrial era. Much of the warming is due to human-produced emissions of greenhouse gases, predominantly carbon dioxide. This heat-trapping gas has increased from a pre-industrial level of about 284 parts per million ( ppm ) in the atmosphere to more than 380 ppm today. With research showing that additional warming of about 1 degree C may be the threshold for dangerous – climate change, the European Union has called for dramatic cuts in emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases.
To examine the impact of such cuts on the world's climate, Washing ton and his colleagues ran a series of global studies with the NCAR - based Community Climate System Model (CCSM). They assumed that carbon dioxide levels could be held to 450 ppm at the end of this century. In contrast, emissions are now on track to reach about 750 ppm by 2100 if unchecked. The team's results showed that if carbon dioxide were held to 450 ppm, global temperatures would increase by 0.6 degrees Celsius above current readings by the end of the century. In contrast, the study showed that temperatures would rise by almost four times that amount to 2.2 degrees Celsius above current readings if emissions were allowed to continue on their present course. Holding carbon dioxide levels to 450 ppm would have other impacts, according to the climate modeling study.
Sea-level rise due to thermal expansion as water temperatures warmed would be 14 centimeters about (5.5 inches) instead of 22 centimeters (8.7 inches). Also, Arctic ice in the summertime would shrink by about a quarter in volume and stabilize by 2100, as opposed to shrinking at least three quarters and continuing to melt, and Arctic warming would be reduced by almost half.
- 1As global warming is not an issue of concernfalse
- 2As the temperatures may rise almost by an additional one degree and this may lead to severe climate changetrue
- 3As the NCAR has forced the European Union to announce the cuts.false
- 4As all the nations have decided to cut emissions of carbon dioxide.false
- 5None of these.false
- Show AnswerHide Answer
- Workspace
- SingleChoice
Answer : 2. "As the temperatures may rise almost by an additional one degree and this may lead to severe climate change"
Explanation :
undefined
Q: Which Indian state borders Nepal, Bhutan and China with three countries?
2519 05f4ca1fb45d1e6391eb8eb98
5f4ca1fb45d1e6391eb8eb98- 1Arunachal Pradeshfalse
- 2Meghalayafalse
- 3West Bengalfalse
- 4Sikkimtrue
- Show AnswerHide Answer
- Workspace
- SingleChoice
Answer : 4. "Sikkim"
Q:In the following sentence found out whether there is any error in any part of the sentence. If there is error mark your answer letter corresponding to that part a,b,c or d.If there is no error mark your answer ‘e’.
The government has signed (a)/ a memorandum of understanding with (b)/ the company to set up (c)/ a piant in the state. (d)/ No error (e)
2519 05dfb2b718014020c0931200a
5dfb2b718014020c0931200a- 1afalse
- 2cfalse
- 3dfalse
- 4etrue
- 5bfalse
- Show AnswerHide Answer
- Workspace
- SingleChoice

