General English Practice Question and Answer

Q:

Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below it. Certain parts are given in bold to answer some of the questions based on the passage.
 Sometimes to upend entrenched power structures, a revolution is required. Naming and shaming powerful men in the #Metoo campaign is in many ways a revolutionary act. The truth about most was known, spoken in whispers, but not to their face. But now that omerta has been broken by some intrepid women , there’s a palpable sense of power and possibility. 

Revolutions are by definition anarchic, as they are aimed against those who make and enforce the rules. So it has been with #MeToo. Men are named, sometimes anonymously, and the naming itself requires punitive action to be taken against them. There isn’t really any room for discussion on context or degree of culpability. Some have raised questions about due process, and the response has been, somewhat reasonably, that due process has failed. And it is true, arguing for due process when due process has failed feels a bit like batting for status quo. So let it be said, #MeToo despite its limitations is unreservedly a good development. However, the question is, what next? The #MeToo movement is more than just outing powerful men, it is about shifting the balance of power between men and women, transferring the punitive aspects — shame, denial of work opportunities — from the victim to the perpetrator. It is about ending impunity embedded in our social construct by shaping new social mores. This is and has to be a collective effort, and it is important for the #MeToo movement to have these discussions.

Let the burden of shame now be shifted to where it is supposed to- the perpetrators and not the women; the victims. It’s the woman who has to hide from the world. And by and large, due to this very fact prevailing in Indian society that many women ultimately choose to leave their jobs, or seek employment elsewhere, when they confront inappropriate behaviour from their colleagues.

Another very important aspect which should be taken care of is that of equality, where there’s no inhibitions, no sense of caution. Women need healthy camaraderie in place of needless caution. Respect, not condescension. They would like colleagues to engage with them, not be patronising. And the fact that they are still having to demand these is telling.

In the context of the passage what do you infer from the word ‘CAMARADERIE’

1324 0

  • 1
    equal sense of responsibility
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 2
    mutual trust and companionship
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 3
    increased intimacy
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 4
    treating with dignity
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 5
    Both 1 and 4
    Correct
    Wrong
  • Show AnswerHide Answer
  • Workspace

Answer : 2. "mutual trust and companionship"

Q:

Direction: In the following question, out of the four alternatives, choose the one which can be substituted for the given sentence.

Violation of something holy or sacred

1324 0

  • 1
    Ritual
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 2
    Ceremony
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 3
    Sacrilege
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 4
    Pious
    Correct
    Wrong
  • Show AnswerHide Answer
  • Workspace

Answer : 3. "Sacrilege"

Q:

The ADVERSITY

1324 0

  • 1
    Failure
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 2
    Helplessness
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 3
    Misfortune
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 4
    Crisis
    Correct
    Wrong
  • Show AnswerHide Answer
  • Workspace

Answer : 3. "Misfortune"

Q:

Select the most appropriate synonym of the given word.

Benign

1324 0

  • 1
    Beneficiary
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 2
    Boisterous
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 3
    Benevolent
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 4
    Boring
    Correct
    Wrong
  • Show AnswerHide Answer
  • Workspace

Answer : 3. "Benevolent"

Q:

Read the following passage carefully and give the answer of following questions.

The cyber–world is ultimately ungovernable. This is alarming as well as convenient; sometimes, convenient because alarming. Some Indian politicians use this to great advantage. When there is an obvious failure in governance during a crisis they deflect attention from their own incompetence towards the ungovernable. So, having failed to prevent nervous citizens from fleeing their cities of work by assuring them of proper protection, some national leaders are now busy trying to prove to one another, and to panic-prone Indians, that a mischievous neighbour has been using the internet and social networking sites to spread dangerous rumours. And the Centre's automatic reaction is to start blocking these sites and begin elaborate and potentially endless negotiations with Google, Twitter and Facebook about access to information. If this is the official idea of prompt action at a time of crisis among communities, then Indians have more reason to fear their protectors than the nebulous mischief-makers of the cyber world. Wasting time gathering proof, blocking vaguely suspicious websites, hurling accusations across the border and worrying about bilateral relations are ways of keeping busy with inessentials because one does not quite known what to do about the essentials of a difficult situation. Besides, only a fifth of the 245 websites blocked by the Centre mention the people of the Northeast or the violence in Assam. And if a few morphed images and spurious texts can unsettle an entire nation, then there is something deeply wrong with the nation and with how it is being governed. This is what its leaders should be addressing immediately, rather than making a wrongheaded display of their powers of censorship.
 It is just as absurd, and part of the same syndrome, to try to ban Twitter accounts that parody despatches from the Prime Minister's Office. To describe such forms of humour and dissent as "misrepresenting" the PMO–as if Twitter would take these parodies for genuine despatches from the PMO — makes the PMO look more ridiculous than its parodists manage to. With the precedent for such action set recently by the chief minister of West Bengal, this is yet another proof that what Bengal thinks today India will think tomorrow. Using the cyber–world for flexing the wrong muscles is essentially not funny. It might even prove to be quite dangerously distracting.

The following is a list of statements made by the author of the above passage. Pick the odd one out

1323 0

  • 1
    It is absurd to ban Twitter accounts that parody despatches from the Prime Minister’s Office.
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 2
    Twitter take these parodies for genuine despatches from the PMO.
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 3
    To describe such forms of humour as ‘misrepresenting’ the PMO makes the PMO look more ridiculous.
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 4
    The Precedent for such action was set recently by the chief minister of West Bengal.
    Correct
    Wrong
  • Show AnswerHide Answer
  • Workspace

Answer : 4. "The Precedent for such action was set recently by the chief minister of West Bengal."

Q:

Identify the word in which the end sound is different from the other words.

1323 0

  • 1
    Sect
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 2
    Conceit
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 3
    concept
    Correct
    Wrong
  • 4
    Percept
    Correct
    Wrong
  • Show AnswerHide Answer
  • Workspace

Answer : 2. "Conceit "

      Report Error

    Please Enter Message
    Error Reported Successfully

      Report Error

    Please Enter Message
    Error Reported Successfully

      Report Error

    Please Enter Message
    Error Reported Successfully

      Report Error

    Please Enter Message
    Error Reported Successfully

      Report Error

    Please Enter Message
    Error Reported Successfully

      Report Error

    Please Enter Message
    Error Reported Successfully

      Report Error

    Please Enter Message
    Error Reported Successfully

      Report Error

    Please Enter Message
    Error Reported Successfully