Statement: 

Should there be a cap on maximum number of contestants for parliamentary elections in any constituency? 

Arguments 

I. Yes, this will make the parliamentary elections more meaningful as the voters can make a considered judgement for casting their vote. 

II. No, in a democracy any person fulfilling the eligibility criteria can contest parliamentary elections and there should be no restrictions. 

Statement:
1. All fishes are birds.
2. Some chickens are fishes.
Conclusion:
I. Some chickens are birds.
II. No bird is a chicken.

Statements: 

Creative persons are learned people. 

Some doctors are creative persons.

Conclusion: 

I. Some creative persons are learned people. 

II. Some learned people are doctors.

Statement: In a mock security drill a the airport, a passenger ignored the instructions of the crew and severely injured his leg while hurrying to get off the plane.
Course of Action:
I. The passenger should sue the airline for negligence
II. The airline should provide immediate medical assistance to the passenger.
Given Answer 
(A) if only course of action I follow
(B) if only course of action II follows.
(C) if either course of action I or course of action II follows.
(D) if neither course of action I nor course of action II follows.
(E) if both courses of action I and II follow.

Direction : In each question are given four statements followed by four conclusions numbered I, II, III and IV. You have to assume every thing in the statements to be true even if they seem to be a variance with commonly known facts and then decide which of the four given conclusions logically follows from the statements, disregarding commonly known facts, and select the appropriate answer.

Statements:
Some english are maths.
All maths are alphabets.
No alphabet is vowel.
All consonants are vowels.
Conclusions :
I. No maths is vowel.
II. No alphabet is consonant.
III. No vowel is english.
IV. All vowels are english.

Directions: Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.

Give answer 
( a ) if only argument I is strong.
( b ) if only argument II is strong.
( c ) if either I or II is strong.
( d ) if neither I nor II is strong.
( e ) if both argument I and II are strong.

Statement:
Should luxury hotels be banned in India?

Arguments 
I. Yes, they are places from where international criminals operate.
II. No, affluent foreign tourists will have no place to stay. 

Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.

Statements:

A. Some cats are dogs.

B. Some trees are dogs.

Conclusions:

(I) Some dogs are cats.

(II) Some cats are trees.

Statement:

Today I must satisfy myself only by looking at a pink-headed duck in an encyclopedia.

Assumptions:

I. Pink headed ducks are as good as extinct now.

II . People refer to encyclopedia to know only about things which do not exist now.