Statement: 

Should Indian scientists working abroad be called back to India? 

Arguments: 

I. Yes, they must serve the motherland first and forget about discoveries, honours, facilities and all. 

II. No, we have enough talent, let them stay where they want 

Given is a statement followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the statement.
Statement:
There is an increase in mobile usage and cell phone towers.
Arguments:
I. It shows global development and fast and easy way to get connected with the wider world.
II. In the long run, there will be more signals that will affect the normal functioning of the ecological systems.

Directions: A statement is given fo, wed by two inferences I and II. You have to consider the statement to be lane even if it seems to be at variance with commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given inferences, if any, follow from the given statement.

Statement:
 Many students are addicted to mobile games and this leads to poor academic performance.

Inference:

I. Many Students are not paying attention to studies due to mobile games.

II. It is only because of mobile games that students fail the examination.

Directions: - Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a ‘strong’ argument and which is a ‘weak’ argument.
Statement: 
Should there be concentration of foreign investment in only few states?
Arguments: 
I. No, it is against the policy of overall development of the country.
II. Yes, large number of states lack infrastructure to attract foreign investment 

Statements:

Some quadrilaterals are squares.

All squares are rhombuses.

Conclusions:

I. No quadrilateral is a rhombus.

II. All rhombuses are squares.

III. Some quadrilaterals are rhombuses.

Direction: In each question given below two/three statements are followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the all given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts. Read the conclusions and decide which logically follows from the two given statements disregarding commonly known facts:
 A. If only conclusion I follows.
 B. If only conclusion II follows.
 C. If either conclusion I or II follows.
 D. If neither conclusion I nor II follows.
 E. If both conclusions I and II follow. 

Statements :
 All Akash is a good doctor.
 All Doctors are usually intelligent.
 Conclusions :
 (I) All intelligent are doctors.
 (II) All Akash is intelligent.

Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.

Statements:

1. All cakes are rocks.

2. All rocks are dams.

Conclusions:

I. Some dams are cakes.

II. All rocks are cakes

Statements: 

No teacher comes to school by bicycle. 

Anand comes to the school by bicycle 

Conclusion: 

I. Anand is not a teacher 

II. Anand is a student.