Logical Reasoning Practice Question and Answer
8 Q: Statements:
Some quadrilaterals are squares.
All squares are rhombuses.
Conclusions:
I. No quadrilateral is a rhombus.
II. All rhombuses are squares.
III. Some quadrilaterals are rhombuses.
1645 05f5093c782a7582d8930e523
5f5093c782a7582d8930e523- 1Only conclusion I followsfalse
- 2Only Conclusion III followstrue
- 3Only conclusion II followsfalse
- 4None of the conclusions followsfalse
- Show AnswerHide Answer
- Workspace
- SingleChoice
Answer : 2. "Only Conclusion III follows"
Q: What is the most crucial message conveyed in the passage?
India, a member of the WTO, is but of course bound by its agreements and conventions. Article 6 of the Agreement on Agriculture, dealing with the provision of the Minimum Support Prices (MSPs) for the agricultural products, is considered to be trade distorting. It is also subjected to various limitations, one of them being the fact that the subsidy arising from ‘minimal supports’ cannot exceed 10 per cent of the value of agricultural production for developing countries. The PDS system in India adheres to the provision of the MSPs and is also involved in the stockholding of the food grains. It is contemplated that in the coming years the subsidy given to the producers will exceed 10 percent of the value of agricultural production.
What is the most crucial message conveyed in the passage?
1644 061816460d1d2fd61946d3ce1
61816460d1d2fd61946d3ce1India, a member of the WTO, is but of course bound by its agreements and conventions. Article 6 of the Agreement on Agriculture, dealing with the provision of the Minimum Support Prices (MSPs) for the agricultural products, is considered to be trade distorting. It is also subjected to various limitations, one of them being the fact that the subsidy arising from ‘minimal supports’ cannot exceed 10 per cent of the value of agricultural production for developing countries. The PDS system in India adheres to the provision of the MSPs and is also involved in the stockholding of the food grains. It is contemplated that in the coming years the subsidy given to the producers will exceed 10 percent of the value of agricultural production.
- 1India should revise its PDS.false
- 2India should not be a member of WTO.false
- 3For India, food security collides with trade.true
- 4India provides food security to its poor.false
- 5None of the above.false
- Show AnswerHide Answer
- Workspace
- SingleChoice
Answer : 3. "For India, food security collides with trade."
Q:DIRECTIONS: In the question below are given two statements followed by two conclusion numbered I and II. You have to take the two given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the two given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.
Statements:
Some teaspoons are glasses.
All teddies are teaspoons.
Conclusions:
I. Some teddies are glasses.
II. Some glasses are teddies.
1644 05ee1b2110cb2490dae79d054
5ee1b2110cb2490dae79d054Some teaspoons are glasses.
All teddies are teaspoons.
Conclusions:
I. Some teddies are glasses.
II. Some glasses are teddies.
- 1if only conclusion I followsfalse
- 2if only conclusion II followsfalse
- 3if either I or II followsfalse
- 4if neither I nor II followstrue
- Show AnswerHide Answer
- Workspace
- SingleChoice
Answer : 4. "if neither I nor II follows"
Q:Two statements are given followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to consider the two statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You are to decide which of the given conclusions can definitely be drawn from the given statements. Indicate your answer.
Statements:
(I) Irregularity is a cause for failure in exams.
(II) Some regular students fail in the examinations.
Conclusions:
(I) All failed students are regular.
(II) All successful students are not regular.
1632 06391c4ded319b37ca1910fa7
6391c4ded319b37ca1910fa7- 1Only I followsfalse
- 2Only II followsfalse
- 3Neither I, nor II followstrue
- 4Both I and II followfalse
- Show AnswerHide Answer
- Workspace
- SingleChoice
Answer : 3. "Neither I, nor II follows "
Q: Direction: Two Statements are given following by four conclusions, I, II, III and IV. You have to consider that Statements to be true, even if they seem to beat variance from commonly known facts. You are to decide which of the given conclusions can definitely be drawn from the given Statements. Indicate your answer.
Statements:
All dogs are books.
All books are pictures.
Conclusion:
I. All dogs are pictures.
II. All books are dogs.
III. All pictures are dogs.
IV. Some pictures are books.
1629 05e90062e90613f3f94231c28
5e90062e90613f3f94231c28Statements:
All dogs are books.
All books are pictures.
Conclusion:
I. All dogs are pictures.
II. All books are dogs.
III. All pictures are dogs.
IV. Some pictures are books.
- 1Only I and IV followstrue
- 2Only II and III followsfalse
- 3Either II or III followsfalse
- 4Either II or IV followsfalse
- Show AnswerHide Answer
- Workspace
- SingleChoice
Answer : 1. "Only I and IV follows "
Q: Directions: - Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a ‘strong’ argument and which is a ‘weak’ argument.
Statement:
Should students take part in politics?
Arguments:
I. Yes, it inculcates in them qualities of leadership.
II. No, they should study and build up their career.
1629 05e9011c8d646bd6677cfd81b
5e9011c8d646bd6677cfd81bStatement:
Should students take part in politics?
Arguments:
I. Yes, it inculcates in them qualities of leadership.
II. No, they should study and build up their career.
- 1if only argument I is strong.false
- 2if only argument II is strong.false
- 3if either I or ll is strong.true
- 4if neither I nor Il is strong.false
- 5if both argument I and II are strong.false
- Show AnswerHide Answer
- Workspace
- SingleChoice
Answer : 3. "if either I or ll is strong. "
Q: Below are given statements followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts.
Statements:
Some cars are trees.
All trees are trucks.
All trucks are tyres.
Conclusions:
I. Some tyres are cars
II. All trees are tyres.
1627 06065a3c02b4b7e646bf9cf53
6065a3c02b4b7e646bf9cf53Statements:
Some cars are trees.
All trees are trucks.
All trucks are tyres.
Conclusions:
I. Some tyres are cars
II. All trees are tyres.
- 1Only Conclusion I followsfalse
- 2Only Conclusion II followsfalse
- 3Both I and II followtrue
- 4Neither I nor II followsfalse
- Show AnswerHide Answer
- Workspace
- SingleChoice
Answer : 3. "Both I and II follow"
- Show AnswerHide Answer
- Workspace
- SingleChoice

