In the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions based on those statements. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements.

Statements:
 1. Some students are teachers.
 2. All teachers are boys.

Conclusions:
 I. All students are boys.
 II. Some boys are students.
 III. Some boys are teachers.
 IV. All teachers are students

Directions: Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument. 

Give answer 

( a ) if only argument I is strong. 

( b ) if only argument II is strong. 

( c) if either I or II is strong. 

( d ) if neither I nor II is strong. 

( e ) if both arguments I and II are strong.

Statement 

Should persons convicted of criminal offenses in the past be allowed to contest elections in India?

Arguments 

I. No, such persons cannot serve the cause of the people and country. 

II. Yes, it is democracy let people decide whom to vote. 

The statements below are followed by two conclusions labelled I and II. Assuming that the information in the statement is true, even if it appears to be variance with generally established facts, decide which conclusion(s) logically and definitely follow(s) from the information given in the statements.
Statement 1 : All shells are skins.
Statement 2 : No skins are cats.
Conclusion I : No shells are cats.
Conclusion II : Some skins are shells.

Directions: One/two statements are given followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to consider the one/two statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You are to decide which of the given conclusion /assumptions can definitely be drawn from the given statements. 

Statement:  

Population explosion has led to deterioration of quality of life in India 

Assumptions: 

(I) Population and quality of life are interrelated. 

(II) Quality of life has no connection with population in India. 

Directions: Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.

Give answer 
( a ) if only argument I is strong.
( b ) if only argument II is strong.
( c ) if either I or II is strong.
( d ) if neither I nor II is strong.
( e ) if both argument I and II are strong.

Statement: 
Should fashionable dresses be banned?
Arguments: 
I. Yes, fashions keep changing and hence consumption of cloth increases.
II. No, fashionable clothes are a person's self-expression and therefore his / her fundamental right. 

Statement-
Some drivers are racers.
Some racers are pilates.
Conclusion:
I. Some pilots are drivers.
II. There are no pilot drivers.

Statement:
Some trees are flowers.
Some flowers are roots.
Some roots are stems.
conclusion :
I. Some trees are stems.
II. Some roots are not flowers.

Directions: - Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a ‘strong’ argument and which is a ‘weak’ argument.
Give answer 
( a ) if only argument I is strong.
( b ) if only argument II is strong.
( c ) if either I or ll is strong.
( d ) if neither I nor Il is strong.
( e ) if both argument I and II are strong. 

Statement 
Should the political parties be banned?
Arguments 
I. Yes, it is necessary to teach a lesson to the politicians.
II. No, it will lead to an end of democracy.