Direction : Following question consists of six statements followed by five conclusions. Consider the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions does not logically follow from the given statements using all statements together. 

Statements: All time are clock.
Some time are minute.
All minute are stone.
No stone is door.
All door are car.
No car is bus.
Conclusions:
(A) Some time are stone.
(B) Some clock are stone.
(C) No minute is door.
(D) Some car are not bus.
(E) Some stone are not car.

Statement:

His recent investment in the shares of Company A is only a gamble.

 Assumptions

I. He may incur loss on his investment.

II. He may gain from his investment.

Directions: In each question below, three statements are given followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the given statements, disregarding the commonly known facts.
Give answer
(A) If either conclusion I or II follows.
(B) If only conclusion I follows.
(C) If neither conclusion I nor II follows.
(D) If both conclusions I and II follow.
(E) If only conclusion II follows.

Statements:
All bullets are guns.
No bullet is pen.
Some pens are swords.
Conclusions:
I. No pen is a gun.
II. Some swords being bullets is a possibility.

Directions: Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.
Give answer 
( a ) if only argument I is strong.
( b ) if only argument II is strong.
( C ) if either I or II is strong.
( d ) if neither I nor II is strong.
( e ) if both arguments I and II are strong.

Statement: 
 Should a total ban be put on trapping wild animals?
 Arguments:
 I. Yes, trappers are making a lot of money.
 II. No, bans on hunting and trapping are not effective. 

In the question below, two statements are given, followed by two conclusions. Assuming the statements to be true, choose the appropriate option regarding the conclusions.

Statements:
 I. Amit is a good fielder
 II. All fielders have big hands.

Conclusions:
 1. All people with big hands are fielders.
 2. Amit has big hands.

Study the following information carefully and answer the questions given below: 

Kids have another reason to cheer. Now they can have their own independent savings account in the banks. In the recent developments, RBI has given permission to banks to offer savings bank account to children above 10 years. These savings accounts will be independent accounts.

(A) Opening a savings bank account is definitely an appreciable move by the RBI. This could help both the kid and the parents in the long run. This could help saving money for their higher studies or marriage or any other emergency in life.

(B) From kids’ point of view, it would be a very good opportunity for them to learn the importance of saving from the early phase of their life. Also, they can get the chance to learn banking and finance much early, the most important aspect of life which is never taught in any school.

(C) Savings do play a very crucial role in establishing a nice future. And one can learn better with the practical knowledge rather than the bookish one. With their own bank account, children can learn to handle cash and bank activities in a much better way. It will also inculcate a habit of saving in the children. They will feel an inner urge to open the accounts and thus, save the money.

(D) Towards the hard note of life, in case the parents face a hard fate leaving the child alone on this wide world, such an account can help the child to be financially secure with some cash to lead their life till they get stable on their life.

(E) With any such aspect of the living, the savings account for a child is definitely a welcome move. This move will gain a lot many applaud from the masses.

(F) RBI has started the new act with an objective to encourage the banking in the untouched areas. Also, it wants children to develop financial responsibility at a very young age. However, the new act can work in the reveres.

(G) The new rule will encourage more banking. It is an encouragement to get a better and organized banking system. And It will make kids more independent as they can now operate their own independent accounts without anyone’s help.

(H) Children cannot handle the money and account at any early age. They can disclose the sensitive information to other people leading to theft and frauds. And the accounts of children can be manipulated and can be used by the parents to fulfill their own personal objectives.

(I) Children will get more financial freedom which they can’t really handle. Savings is one aspect of having a bank account and expenses the other. So, how will children stay untouched from it.

Which of the following among I, F, G and D may be a conclusion in favour of new rule of RBI?

Direction : In the following question, one statement is given, followed by two conclusion I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follow from the given statement. 

Statement : All philosophers are men. Socrates was a philosopher. 

Conclusion : 

I. Socrates was a man. 

II. Women cannot become philosophers. 

In each of the following questions a statement is given followed by two courses of Action. A course of Action is taken for improvement, follow up etc. Read the statement carefully and give answer -
Statement:
A survey conducted in eight airports has revealed that airports continue to be porous and security as bad as ever.
Course of action:
I. adequate perimeter fencing should be provided.
II. New machines of latest order should be deployed for security purposes.