Direction: In each question given below two/three statements are followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the all given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts. Read the conclusions and decide which logically follows from the two given statements disregarding commonly known facts:
 A. If only conclusion I follows.
 B. If only conclusion II follows.
 C. If either conclusion I or II follows.
 D. If neither conclusion I nor II follows.
 E. If both conclusions I and II follow. 

Statements:
 Some boys are graduates.
 All Bachelors are not boys.
 Some boys smoke regularly.
 Conclusions:
 (I) All bachelor do not smoke regularly.
 (II) All Bachelors may be graduates.

Statement 

Should high chimneys be installed in industries? 

Arguments 

I. Yes, it reduces pollution at ground level. 

II. No, it increases pollution in upper atmosphere. 

Direction: In the question below are given three statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.

Statements:
 All Cooks are Food
 Only a few Foods are Drink
 No Drink is Snack
 Conclusions:
 I. Some Cooks are not Drink
 II. Some Foods are not Snack

In the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions based on those statements. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements.

Statements:
 No student is a teacher.
 All students are children.
 Some girls are students.

Conclusions:
 I. Some children are not teachers.
 II. Some girls are not teachers.
 III. No girl is a teacher.

Study the following information carefully and answer the questions given below: 

Statement: The Election Commission (EC), over the course of the 2014 general election, has reported a massive infusion of cash and gifts to buy votes and influence results. 

(A) The EC seized over two billion rupees in unaccounted money from across the country.

(B) Political parties and leaders can win elections by excluding people’s social choices.

(C) These malpractices actively restrict wider participation and representation of interests, that create conditions to sustain governments with strong authoritarian tendencies.

(D) Electoral corruption is direct dispossession of the right to representation and governance.

Which of the following option can be an effect of the statement of the EC?

Directions: In each question of below are two / three statements followed by two conclusions numbered I  and II . You have to take the two / three given statements. to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.
Give answer
(1) If only conclusion I follows
(2) If only conclusion II follows
(3) If either conclusion I or conclusion II follows
(4) If neither conclusion I nor conclusion II follows
(5) If both conclusion I and conclusion II follow 

Statements:
No fern is a plant.
All roots are ferns.
Conclusions
I. No plant is a root.
II. All ferns are roots.

Direction: In these questions the symbols $ , @ , £ , • and # are used with different meanings as given below :
' X $ Y ' means X is neither greater than nor smaller than Y '
 ' X @ Y ' means X is neither greater than nor equal to Y '
 ' X £ Y ' means X is neither smaller than nor equal to Y '
 ' X• Y ' means X is not smaller than Y '
' X # Y ' means X is not greater than Y '
( A ) If only conclusion I is true
( B ) If only conclusion II is true
( C ) If either conclusion I or II is true
(D ) If neither conclusion I nor II is true
( E ) If both conclusion I and II are true    

Statements: Z£N, N # K, K $ M, M@R 

In the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions based on those statements. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements.

Statements:
 I. Some Z are X.
 II. Some W are Z.

Conclusions:
 I. Some X are not W.
 II. Some X are not Z.