Direction : Following question consists of six statements followed by five conclusions. Consider the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions does not logically follow from the given statements using all statements together. 

Statements: Some bird are tree.
All tree are forest.
No tree is man.
All man are air.
Some man are cow.
No cow is lion.
 Conclusions:
(A) Some bird are forest.
(B) Some bird are not man.
(C) All bird being lion is a possibility.
(D) All cow being tree is a possibility.
(E) Some forest are not man 

Direction: In these questions the symbols $ , @ , £ , • and # are used with different meanings as given below :
' X $ Y ' means X is neither greater than nor smaller than Y '
 ' X @ Y ' means X is neither greater than nor equal to Y '
 ' X £ Y ' means X is neither smaller than nor equal to Y '
 ' X• Y ' means X is not smaller than Y '
' X # Y ' means X is not greater than Y '
( A ) If only conclusion I is true
( B ) If only conclusion II is true
( C ) If either conclusion I or II is true
(D ) If neither conclusion I nor II is true
( E ) If both conclusion I and II are true    

Statements: S$ Q, Q@B, B• K, K # W
 Conclusions:
I. K# S
II. S@ W

Study the following information carefully and answer the questions given below: 

Statement: The Election Commission (EC), over the course of the 2014 general election, has reported a massive infusion of cash and gifts to buy votes and influence results. 

(A) The EC seized over two billion rupees in unaccounted money from across the country.

(B) Political parties and leaders can win elections by excluding people’s social choices.

(C) These malpractices actively restrict wider participation and representation of interests, that create conditions to sustain governments with strong authoritarian tendencies.

(D) Electoral corruption is direct dispossession of the right to representation and governance.

Statement:

Traffic jams on most of the roads in the city have become a regular feature during monsoon.

Assumptions:

I. Material used for road construction cannot withstand the fury of monsoon resulting into innumerable potholes on the roads.

Study the following information carefully and answer the questions given below: 

Statement: The Election Commission (EC), over the course of the 2014 general election, has reported a massive infusion of cash and gifts to buy votes and influence results. 

(A) The EC seized over two billion rupees in unaccounted money from across the country.

(B) Political parties and leaders can win elections by excluding people’s social choices.

(C) These malpractices actively restrict wider participation and representation of interests, that create conditions to sustain governments with strong authoritarian tendencies.

(D) Electoral corruption is direct dispossession of the right to representation and governance.

Two statements are given, followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.

Statements:
 Some chairs are windows.
 All windows are boards.

Conclusions:
 I. All chairs are boards.
 II. All boards are windows.

In the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions based on those statements. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements.

Statements:
 No student is a teacher.
 All students are children.
 Some girls are students.

Conclusions:
 I. Some children are not teachers.
 II. Some girls are not teachers.
 III. No girl is a teacher.

Direction :In each question below are given three four conclusion numbered I, II, III and IV. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements, disregarding commonly known facts. statements followed by

Statements :
Some pepsi are coffee .
Some coke are pepsi .
All coffee are tea .
Conclusions :
I . Some coffee are pepsi .
II . Some coffee are not pepsi .
III . Some coke are coffee .
IV . Some tea are pepsi .