In this question, a statement is followed by two courses of actions, numbered I and II. You must assume everything in the statement to be true and on the basis of the information given in the statement, decide which of the course of action/s logically follow for pursuing. Statement: Some serious mistakes were found in the technical section of a company. Course of Action:

I. An efficient technical team should be appointed to check the technical errors.
II. A reason explanation notice should be issued to all the employees involved in the irregularities.

A statement is given followed by four alternative arguments. Select the alternative which is most appropriate. 

Statement:  
Is it necessary that education should be job oriented?  

Arguments:  

I. Yes, the aim of education is to prepare persons for earning.  

II. Yes, educated person should stand on his own feet after completion of education. 

III. No, education should be for sake of knowledge only.  

IV. No, one may take up agriculture where education is not necessary. 

A question is given, followed by two statements numbered (I) and (II). You have to decide whether the data provided in the statements is sufficient to answer the question. Read both the statements and select the appropriate answer.
 Question: How many people are standing in the row where all people are facing north?
Statements:
 (I) A is fourth from the left end; M is second to the right of A; and R is second from the left end.
 (II) M is fourth from the right end; only two people Stand between M and B.

Directions: A statement is given followed by two inferences I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance with commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given inferences, if any, follow from the given statement.

Statement I: Classical Indian logicians (Naiyāyikas) define Upamāna (Comparison) as the cognition of the new object through similarity, known by another means of cognition. 

Statement II: Naiyāyikas consider upamāna as a type of inductive reasoning and therefore view it as a type of inference (anumāna) only. 

Statement - Quality has a price tag. India is allocating lots of funds to education.

Conclusion - I. Quality of education in India would improve soon

                       II. Funding alone can enhance quality of education