In the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions based on those statements. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements.

Statements:
 I. Some W are F.
 II. Some R are F.
Conclusion:
 I. Some R are not W.
 II. No W is R.

Direction: In the question below are given three statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.

Statements:
 All Cooks are Food
 Only a few Foods are Drink
 No Drink is Snack
 Conclusions:
 I. Some Cooks are not Drink
 II. Some Foods are not Snack

Based on the statement(s) given below, choose the best possible conclusion(s) that follows.
Statements: Players who break records in a fair way are given a special reward.
Player XYZ broke the world record but was found to be under the influence of a prohibited drug.
Conclusions:
I. The accusation on Player XYZ was false.
II. Player XYZ will not get a special reward. 

Direction: In these questions, relation between different elements is shown in the statements. The statements are followed by two conclusions. Study the conclusions based on the given statement and select the appropriate answer. 

Statement: B> C > D ≤ E;  D ≥ F > G
Conclusions:
I. F<E
II. F= E 

Direction : In the following question, one statement is given, followed by two conclusion I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follow from the given statement. 

Statement : All philosophers are men. Socrates was a philosopher. 

Conclusion : 

I. Socrates was a man. 

II. Women cannot become philosophers. 

One statement is given followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You are to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follow from the given statement. Indicate your answer. 

Statement:  

No children are voters.  

Conclusions: 

I. All adults are voters.  

II. No voters are children.  

Study the following information carefully and answer the questions given below: 

Statement: The Election Commission (EC), over the course of the 2014 general election, has reported a massive infusion of cash and gifts to buy votes and influence results. 

(A) The EC seized over two billion rupees in unaccounted money from across the country.

(B) Political parties and leaders can win elections by excluding people’s social choices.

(C) These malpractices actively restrict wider participation and representation of interests, that create conditions to sustain governments with strong authoritarian tendencies.

(D) Electoral corruption is direct dispossession of the right to representation and governance.

Which of the following option can be an effect of the statement of the EC?

Direction: In the question below are given three statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.

Statements:
 Only a few Marine is Sea
 All Sea is Wave
 No Ocean is Marine
 Conclusions: 
 I. Some Waves are not Ocean
 II. Some Sea are not Marine