Logical Reasoning Practice Question and Answer
8 Q: Statements: T > D ≥ P , F ≥ P = R
Conclusions: T > R , D > F
1287 46216f36a3e501f3ab09fd5b3
6216f36a3e501f3ab09fd5b3- 1Only conclusion I follows.true
- 2Only conclusion II follows.false
- 3Both conclusion I and II follow.false
- 4Neither conclusion I nor conclusion II follows.false
- 5Either conclusion I or conclusion II follows.false
- Show Answer
- Workspace
- SingleChoice
Answer : 1. "Only conclusion I follows."
Q:Direction: - In the following question, a statement is given followed by two courses of Action. A course of Action is taken for improvement, follow up etc. Read the statement carefully and give answer -
1. If only Course of Action I follow.
2. If only Course of Action II follows.
3. If either Course of Action I or II follows.
4. If neither Course of Action I nor II follows.
5. If both Course of Action I and II follow.
Statement:
The police department has come under a cloud with recent revelations that at least two senior police officials are suspected to have been involved in the illegal sale of a large quantity of weapons from the state police armory.
Course of Action -
I. A through investigation should be ordered by the State Government to bring out all those who are involved into the illegal sale of arms.
II. State police armory should be kept under the Central Government's control.
1286 05f2be9e9be9f31290fb490b6
5f2be9e9be9f31290fb490b61. If only Course of Action I follow.
2. If only Course of Action II follows.
3. If either Course of Action I or II follows.
4. If neither Course of Action I nor II follows.
5. If both Course of Action I and II follow.
The police department has come under a cloud with recent revelations that at least two senior police officials are suspected to have been involved in the illegal sale of a large quantity of weapons from the state police armory.
Course of Action -
I. A through investigation should be ordered by the State Government to bring out all those who are involved into the illegal sale of arms.
II. State police armory should be kept under the Central Government's control.
- 11true
- 22false
- 33false
- 44false
- 55false
- Show Answer
- Workspace
- SingleChoice
Answer : 1. "1"
Q:In the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions based on those statements. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements.
Statements:
Some bulbs are switches.
No switch is a vase.
All fans are switches.
Conclusions:
I. Some bulbs being fans is a possibility.
II. No fan is a vase.
III. All switches are fans.
IV. No bulb is a vase.
1280 0649c1e73c7d7c7e06730edf4
649c1e73c7d7c7e06730edf4Some bulbs are switches.
No switch is a vase.
All fans are switches.
I. Some bulbs being fans is a possibility.
II. No fan is a vase.
III. All switches are fans.
IV. No bulb is a vase.
- 1Only Conclusions II and III followfalse
- 2Only Conclusions I and II followtrue
- 3Only Conclusions I, II and IV followfalse
- 4Only Conclusion I followsfalse
- Show Answer
- Workspace
- SingleChoice
Answer : 2. "Only Conclusions I and II follow"
Q:Direction: - In each question given below four statements are followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the four statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts. Read the conclusions and decide which logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts:
1. If only conclusion I follows.
2. If only conclusion II follows.
3. If either conclusion I or II follows.
4. If neither conclusion I nor II follows.
5. If both conclusions I and II follow.
Statements:
Some ode are lovely. All lovely are music
No music is sad. No sad is joy
Conclusions:
(I) Some ode are not music
(II) Some music being sad is a possibility
1278 05ed9bb20b516791f26538a3f
5ed9bb20b516791f26538a3f1. If only conclusion I follows.
2. If only conclusion II follows.
3. If either conclusion I or II follows.
4. If neither conclusion I nor II follows.
5. If both conclusions I and II follow.
Some ode are lovely. All lovely are music
No music is sad. No sad is joy
Conclusions:
(I) Some ode are not music
(II) Some music being sad is a possibility
- 11false
- 22false
- 33false
- 44true
- 55false
- Show Answer
- Workspace
- SingleChoice
Answer : 4. "4"
Q:Direction: In the question given below , two statements are given followed by four Conclusion I, II, III and IV.You have to consider the two statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts .You have to decide which of the given conclusion , if any , follow from the given statements.
Statements:
All benches are table.
No table is chair.
Conclusion:
I. All benches are chairs
II. All tables are benches
III. No tables are benches
IV. No benches are chairs
1273 05efc18ed196e681f76e9be29
5efc18ed196e681f76e9be29All benches are table.
No table is chair.
Conclusion:
I. All benches are chairs
II. All tables are benches
III. No tables are benches
IV. No benches are chairs
- 1Only conclusion II followsfalse
- 2Only conclusion III followsfalse
- 3Only conclusion IV followstrue
- 4Only conclusion I followsfalse
- Show Answer
- Workspace
- SingleChoice
Answer : 3. "Only conclusion IV follows "
Q: Statements:
No teacher comes to school by bicycle.
Anand comes to the school by bicycle
Conclusion:
I. Anand is not a teacher
II. Anand is a student.
1269 05f6990d8558d255013b2c2e3
5f6990d8558d255013b2c2e3- 1Neither conclusion I nor II follow.false
- 2Conclusion I follows.true
- 3Conclusion II followfalse
- 4Both conclusion I and II followfalse
- Show Answer
- Workspace
- SingleChoice
Answer : 2. "Conclusion I follows. "
Q: Statement:
Should Indian scientists working abroad be called back to India?
Arguments:
I. Yes, they must serve the motherland first and forget about discoveries, honours, facilities and all.
II. No, we have enough talent, let them stay where they want
1266 05f6b2d80e68c06196f211e7c
5f6b2d80e68c06196f211e7c- 1Cfalse
- 2Dtrue
- 3Afalse
- 4Bfalse
- 5Efalse
- Show Answer
- Workspace
- SingleChoice
Answer : 2. "D"
Q: What is the most crucial message conveyed in the passage?
India, a member of the WTO, is but of course bound by its agreements and conventions. Article 6 of the Agreement on Agriculture, dealing with the provision of the Minimum Support Prices (MSPs) for the agricultural products, is considered to be trade distorting. It is also subjected to various limitations, one of them being the fact that the subsidy arising from ‘minimal supports’ cannot exceed 10 per cent of the value of agricultural production for developing countries. The PDS system in India adheres to the provision of the MSPs and is also involved in the stockholding of the food grains. It is contemplated that in the coming years the subsidy given to the producers will exceed 10 percent of the value of agricultural production.
What is the most crucial message conveyed in the passage?
1265 061816460d1d2fd61946d3ce1
61816460d1d2fd61946d3ce1India, a member of the WTO, is but of course bound by its agreements and conventions. Article 6 of the Agreement on Agriculture, dealing with the provision of the Minimum Support Prices (MSPs) for the agricultural products, is considered to be trade distorting. It is also subjected to various limitations, one of them being the fact that the subsidy arising from ‘minimal supports’ cannot exceed 10 per cent of the value of agricultural production for developing countries. The PDS system in India adheres to the provision of the MSPs and is also involved in the stockholding of the food grains. It is contemplated that in the coming years the subsidy given to the producers will exceed 10 percent of the value of agricultural production.
- 1India should revise its PDS.false
- 2India should not be a member of WTO.false
- 3For India, food security collides with trade.true
- 4India provides food security to its poor.false
- 5None of the above.false
- Show Answer
- Workspace
- SingleChoice