In the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions based on those statements. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements.

Statements:
 1. Some students are teachers.
 2. All teachers are boys.

Conclusions:
 I. All students are boys.
 II. Some boys are students.
 III. Some boys are teachers.
 IV. All teachers are students

Direction: In each question given below two/three statements are followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the all given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts. Read the conclusions and decide which logically follows from the two given statements disregarding commonly known facts:
 A. If only conclusion I follows.
 B. If only conclusion II follows.
 C. If either conclusion I or II follows.
 D. If neither conclusion I nor II follows.
 E. If both conclusions I and II follow. 

Statements :
 All Akash is a good doctor.
 All Doctors are usually intelligent.
 Conclusions :
 (I) All intelligent are doctors.
 (II) All Akash is intelligent.

Statement: 

Should all the infrastructural development projects in India be handed over to the private sector? 

Arguments: 

I. No, the private sector entities are not equipped to handle such projects. 

II. Yes, such projects are handled by private sector in the developed countries. 

Read the statements and select a conclusion from the given alternatives: 

Statements: 
Some owls are ostriches.
Some ostriches are crows.
Some crows are black.
Conclusion: 
1. Some owls are black.
2. No ostrich is black.
3. No owl is black.
4. Some ostriches are black. 

Two statements are followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You should take both the statements to be true even if there is a difference of commonly known facts. You decide which of the given conclusions is definitely taken from the given statements.

Statements:

(i) All pens are pencils.

(ii) All books are pencils.

Conclusions:

I: All pens are books.

II: Some books are pens.

The statements below are followed by two conclusions labelled I and II. Assuming that the information in the statement is true, even if it appears to be variance with generally established facts, decide which conclusion(s) logically and definitely follow(s) from the information given in the statements.
Statement 1 : All shells are skins.
Statement 2 : No skins are cats.
Conclusion I : No shells are cats.
Conclusion II : Some skins are shells.

Directions: Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument. 

Give answer 

( a ) if only argument I is strong. 

( b ) if only argument II is strong. 

( c) if either I or II is strong. 

( d ) if neither I nor II is strong. 

( e ) if both arguments I and II are strong.

Statement 

Should persons convicted of criminal offenses in the past be allowed to contest elections in India?

Arguments 

I. No, such persons cannot serve the cause of the people and country. 

II. Yes, it is democracy let people decide whom to vote. 

Statement:
Some trees are flowers.
Some flowers are roots.
Some roots are stems.
conclusion :
I. Some trees are stems.
II. Some roots are not flowers.