Statement:
Some trees are flowers.
Some flowers are roots.
Some roots are stems.
conclusion :
I. Some trees are stems.
II. Some roots are not flowers.

A statement is given below followed by two assumptions numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the assumption is implicit in the statement.

Statement:
 A warning in a train compartment "To stop train, pull the chain". Penalty for improper use 1000."

Assumptions.
 I. Some people misuse the stop chain.
 II. On certain occasions, people may want to stop a running train.

The statements below are followed by two conclusions labelled I and II. Assuming that the information in the statement is true, even if it appears to be variance with generally established facts, decide which conclusion(s) logically and definitely follow(s) from the information given in the statements.
Statement 1 : All shells are skins.
Statement 2 : No skins are cats.
Conclusion I : No shells are cats.
Conclusion II : Some skins are shells.

Statement: 

Should all the infrastructural development projects in India be handed over to the private sector? 

Arguments: 

I. No, the private sector entities are not equipped to handle such projects. 

II. Yes, such projects are handled by private sector in the developed countries. 

Direction: - In each question given below four statements are followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the four statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts. Read the conclusions and decide which logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts:

1. If only conclusion I follows.
 2. If only conclusion II follows.
 3. If either conclusion I or II follows.
 4. If neither conclusion I nor II follows.
 5. If both conclusions I and II follow.

Statements:
Some ode are lovely. All lovely are music
No music is sad. No sad is joy
Conclusions:
(I) Some ode are not music
(II) Some music being sad is a possibility 

A statement is given below followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.

Statement:
 Should foreign films be banned in India?

Arguments:
 I. Yes, they depict an alien culture which adversely affects our values.
 II. No, foreign films are of a high artistic standard.

Direction: In each question given below two/three statements are followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the all given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts. Read the conclusions and decide which logically follows from the two given statements disregarding commonly known facts:
 A. If only conclusion I follows.
 B. If only conclusion II follows.
 C. If either conclusion I or II follows.
 D. If neither conclusion I nor II follows.
 E. If both conclusions I and II follow. 

Statements :
 All Akash is a good doctor.
 All Doctors are usually intelligent.
 Conclusions :
 (I) All intelligent are doctors.
 (II) All Akash is intelligent.

Consider the given statement to be true and decide which of the conclusion(s) logically follows from the statement.

Statements:

1. No sweet is biscuit.

2. No biscuit is cake.

Conclusions:

1. Some sweets can be biscuits.

2. All biscuit can be cake.