Two statements are given, followed by four conclusions numbered I, II, III and IV. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.

Statements:
 No fish is a pen.
 All keys are pens.

Conclusions:
 I. No key is a pen.
 II. No pen is a key.
 III. Some pens are keys.
 IV. Some keys are fishes.

In the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions based on those statements. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements.

Statements:
 All javascript are binary.
 All binary are minecraft.
 All roblox are minecraft.

Conclusions:
 I. Some javascript are roblox.
 II. Some javascript are minecraft.
 III. All javascript are minecraft.

A question is given, followed by two statements numbered (I) and (II). You have to decide whether the data provided in the statements is sufficient to answer the question. Read both the statements and select the appropriate answer.
 Question: How many people are standing in the row where all people are facing north?
Statements:
 (I) A is fourth from the left end; M is second to the right of A; and R is second from the left end.
 (II) M is fourth from the right end; only two people Stand between M and B.

Directions: A statement is given followed by two inferences I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance with commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given inferences, if any, follow from the given statement.

Statement I: Classical Indian logicians (Naiyāyikas) define Upamāna (Comparison) as the cognition of the new object through similarity, known by another means of cognition. 

Statement II: Naiyāyikas consider upamāna as a type of inductive reasoning and therefore view it as a type of inference (anumāna) only. 

Directions: In each question below are given two/three statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.

Statements: 

Some chair is table.
 Some bed is table.
 No furniture is bed.

Conclusions:

I. some table is not furniture.
 II. All table being furniture is a possibility.

In the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions based on those statements. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements.

Statements:
 I. All pencil are pen.
 II. Some pen are rubber.

Conclusion:
 I. All rubber are pencil.
 II. Some pen are not pencil.
 III. Some rubber are not pen.

Direction: In the question below are given three statements followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.

Statements:

Some beds are sofas.

Some sofas are chairs.

All chairs are books.

Conclusions:

I. Some beds are chairs.

II. Some sofas are books.

Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.

Statements:

Some tablets are laptops.

Some laptops are computers.

Conclusions:

I. Some tablets are computers.

II. Some laptops are not tablets.